Disastrous

 Look, I had better things to do than watch Cheeto Benito slur and mumble his way through some half-assed update on his Iran War. As Josh Marshall noted, it was a terrible speech that spooked ALL the markets. Krugman makes roughly the same point.

Perhaps Trump is stung in his small, craven id by the concept of TACO - Trump Always Chickens Out - and feels compelled to not wind this war down quickly.

Then again, the problem is that, strategically, Iran is winning. They are demonstrating that they can absorb far more pressure than we can. Trump never sold this war to the public, so he can't really turn around and ask for ground troops or people to buckle up for $5.00 a gallon gas. We are still going to GET $5.00 a gallon, but he can't admit that. Iran is being leveled tactically, but they are pretty much OK with that, because things were already pretty shitty and they don't have to answer to their public.

Trump cannot walk away easily from this, though I suspect he will try. It's unclear whether we are actually going to deploy the combat troops we are sending to the region. Frankly, the only defensible use of them might be to invade Yemen and degrade the Houthis to deprive Iran of one of their few remaining proxies that has any combat effectiveness. However, sending US soldiers to die killing Yemenis while Iran jacks up fuel prices is a political non-starter.

The contours of the end of this conflict currently looks like this. Trump will feel compelled to "do something" in terms of "boots on the ground." His "doing something" will be stupid and "lethal" just not in the way Hegseth wants it to be. In the end, he will climb down from this cliff, but he will leave the Iranian regime in control of the Straits of Hormuz, where they will charge tolls for transit. 

In the end, Tehran will have a revenue source that they don't have now, because this fucking idiot thought getting involved in a war on the Middle East would be easy.

Pundit Fallacy

 Yglesias says that Democratic strategists that say that Democrats need to find a straight white guy to nominate in 2028 are being dumb. His argument is that women get elected to Congress just fine. In fact, what he runs into is a data problem. There are hundreds of legislative elections every two years, so you get a robust set of examples/

With the presidency, we have basically two examples. In 2016, the least qualified person to ever be a major party nominee took on arguably the most qualified candidate ever (who wasn't running for re-election). The reality TV star who mocked Gold Star families, bragged on tape about sexually assaulting women and clearly had no idea what to do about health care managed to beat a former First Lady, Senator and Secretary of State. Eight years later - having botched Covid, launched an insurrection and been convicted of 34 felonies - he again beat a well qualified woman.

Maybe Trump's brand of toxic masculinity really does appeal in ways that JD Vance (I don't think he will be the nominee) can't pull off. Maybe whomever comes after Trump won't be able to motivate latent misogyny in the same way.

But this shit is typical of the Yglesias Fallacy. He once argued for the Pundit's Fallacy, that every pundit thinks that if a candidate just adopts the same positions the pundit holds, then they will win. The Yglesias Fallacy is that the median voter really understands policy at all. That they don't just vote the vibes, but sit there and ponder over white papers.

Partisans have ideological positions; that's why they are partisans. The voters that decide elections are feckless rubes without a complicated thought to pollute their beautiful spotless minds. When it comes to female candidates, "There's just something about her...:"

Unitary Power

 Richardson' daily catalog of the atrocities is particularly redolent of flop sweat coming from Trump. There were a host of court decisions against him, including his precious ballroom project. He issued an Executive Order on mail-in voting that is just blatantly illegal and unconstitutional. He's floundering on Iran and the resulting economic pain it's causing.

All of this is to say that Trump's tight grip on power seems to be slipping. The ultimate sign will be large fissures between the White House and Congressional Republicans. I would guess that this would only happen after primaries are over and incumbents feel secure enough to distance themselves from him in order to stave off defeat in the general election.

April Fool's Day has lost its luster in a world with so much lying, but maybe some small semblance of reality will bring this nattering buffoon back to earth.