You know...Morons.
When you read that piece - and you should - you need to really dig deeper into the reasons why the WWC continually votes against their economic interests.
First of all, as this fine fellow pointed out, they don't necessarily define their interests in economic terms. You hear echoes of it in the interviews about wanting Trump "to shake things up." You also hear, repeatedly, incredulity that the GOP would be so cruel and callous as to wrench away health insurance from tens of millions of Americans. Simultaneously, you hear carping about the unwieldiness and expense of ACA. But as much as they bitch about it, they need it.
Usually, the conventional wisdom that says politicians lie about their plans is wrong. Politicians almost always try to accomplish what they say they want to do. In fact, that's exactly what GOP House members are doing when they talk about cutting Social Security benefits, ending Medicare as we know it and, yes, repealing Obamacare.
This is the wages of cynicism, sure as the voters who pulled the lever for Jill Stein. These voters assumed that Trump wouldn't do what Trump said he would do.
And it will kill some of them.
So, they aren't voting against their economic interests. They are voting FOR their ethnic and racial interests. They are placing a primacy on their whiteness and ruralness over their economic well being. Hey, I get why a rich guy voted for Trump out of the cynical understanding he would get more money from tax cuts. Sickens me, but I get it.
What we have seen from WWC voters - especially in the South, and what is rural Pennsylvania but Pennsyltucky - is a repeated denial of their economic interests in preference for their racial interests.
But, yes, let's talk about how Clinton had a messaging problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment