Blog Credo

The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.

H.L. Mencken

Monday, December 5, 2011

Wherein, Daily Kos Becomes Almost Irrelevant

Where's Markos Waldo?

One of the things that drew me to the blogosphere was the fact that nowhere in the traditional media did I hear much that I agreed with, especially in the run-up to the Iraq War.  I guess it started with the 2000 Election (fuzzy math/Gore's sighs), accelerated with the recount and then exploded with the manufactured war.  It's not that I'm a Super Genius, but I am not stupid and I am relatively well informed.  As I became a more experienced history teacher, I also learned more context for things that were happening around me (which is the point, after all, of studying history).

I think Eschaton was the first blog I visited and quickly moved from the Baby Blue Cherub to the Great Orange Satan.  It was at Kos that I first learned of the maxim "More and Better Democrats".  

The "More" part is pretty self-explanatory.  There is a fundamental calculation that Markos was making that you have to tolerate "ConservaDems" in conservative districts and states in order to get majorities in Congress.  This strategy bore fruit finally in the 2006 midterms.

The "Better" part was trying to force more progressive candidates on to bluer states and districts.  The best example of this has been the long and finally fruitful effort to kick Joe Lieberman into retirement.  Lieberman simply does not represent the Democratic party of Connecticut.  You need a better Democrat from Connecticut in order to balance out the more conservative/centrist members.

The "More Democrats" is why Daily Kos threw its support behind guys like Jon Tester in Montana and Mark Warner in Virginia.  And when Tester flirted with apostasy on the Obama jobs bill, the community at Daily Kos pretty much revolted.  Warner lost them years ago.  Same with Jim Webb.

Most of it is a combination memory loss/political ADHD, where they forget what life was like in Bush's America.  Some of it is the sanctimonious that often accompanies the Left.  There's a fair amount of not having a common enemy to focus on, too.

But it now seems like Daily Kos is abandoning the More Democrats for the Better Democrats.  That's fine, that's their right, and the site has been trending that way since the public option fight.  

But for the Democrats to retake the House, they need More Democrats.  Many of the Better Democrats are safe in their seats.  Some, like Alan Grayson, went too far, too fast with their constituencies, but most are ensconced in true blue districts.  Without widening the field to include the "More", having a rump of the "Better" is not helpful, especially in the House with its majoritarian rules and procedures.

I'm not sure where the "More" camp will migrate to.  But there needs to be a big institutional site for them/us.  

Sunday, December 4, 2011

Here I Am! Rock Me Like A Herman Cain!

Wow, no one could have predicted...

Since I'm a day late on the Herman Cain withdrawal, I will just throw a bunch of links at you.

First, there is Booman's "What I learned from Herman Cain".

Second, because of course, we have The Onion.

Herman Cain was always more of an act of political performance art.  He was on the grift and out to sell some books.  Run for President, charm some people, maybe you get a comfy gig at Fox.  There are lots of blonde ladies at Fox for Herman to hit on, so I can see the appeal.

Most of Cain's "ideas" were pure hokum.  The 9-9-9 plan was apparently based on the Sims video game.  His willful ignorance about anything related to foreign affairs was kind of frightening after a point.  I mean, Rick Perry is too stupid to know anything about Uzbekistan, but Cain just refused to learn about it.

But unlike Gingrich or Romney, he was likable.  He passed the "Who do you want to have a beer with?" test.  Mainly because Romney and Huntsman are forbidden from drinking, Gingrich would probably be all pompous about the merits of microbrews and the history of fermentation, while Bachmann after a few sips would get all clingy and talk about how Marcus spends so much time with troubled boys that he never touches her anymore.  Awkward.

Gingrich probably stands to win from this.  He's a lot of people's second choice, which is fitting for a man working on his own third choice.  If the bulk of Cain's support goes to Newt, he wins Iowa.  If he wins Iowa and runs a strong second in New Hampshire, he probably sweeps South Carolina and Florida.

The only thing now standing between Gingrich and the GOP nomination is Newt Gingrich.

Saturday, December 3, 2011

Hell Weeks Begin

One damned thing after another.

So, I have a wrestling tournament today, followed by school duty until midnight.

I also collect 24 research papers that have to be graded by Thursday morning.  Friday morning I give my final exams and have to turn those around by Monday.  Then it's comment writing time.

It could be worse, I suppose.  I could - like My Most Wondrous and Delectable Wife - be a class dean and have to write an additional 40 letters.

So, I leave you with this from Charlie Pierce:


The president had a plan to put people to work repairing this country's disgraceful infrastructure. This was knocked down in the Congress, not because it wouldn't work, but because it might. I would like any of the glibertarian nitwits who scorn these kinds of programs to explain to a father of three that he's better off working six weeks stocking Chinese-made crap at some electronics-store chain than he would be working for a year fixing a bridge, or building a water-treatment plant, or retrofitting a building with energy-saving technology. I grow tired of the prevailing assumption that we are simply a nation of temp workers in waiting. You can take your grandchildren to see a bridge you built. (I knew old WPA hands who did exactly that, and there was a railroad bridge out in the woods in the state forest in which I once worked that old folks would walk down the trails just to visit.) Work has to be more than a paycheck graciously granted to you by some board of directors that might as well be on Mars. People want more than jobs. They want to produce something. They want to contribute to something bigger than themselves that isn't necessarily The Company.

Instead, we get vague promises of a golden age of global capitalism. We get invective about the unemployed, and those people who are outside yelling at the buildings wherein the lifeblood of the American economy continues to be siphoned off into business that produce nothing. And eight percent of us could be building bridges, and are not.

Politically, this should be unsurvivable. For anyone. Politically, this should be a more serious bit of business than who got jiggy with whom back way back in the day. Politically, this should be the moment at which the country adopts this blog's fundamental economic theory:

Fk The Deficit. People Got No Jobs. People Got No Money.

Instead, things are looking up!


Read more: http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/job-numbers-for-november-2011-6607826#ixzz1fTrECjmd

Friday, December 2, 2011

Oh, Herman...

Herman Cain strikes back.

Oh, my.

Just go read this.

http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2011/12/02/women-who-love-herman-who-loves-women/

How can you shame a man to quit his campaign when he has no obvious sense of shame?

Thursday, December 1, 2011

Oh, Mittens...

Mitt vs the bear.

http://www.balloon-juice.com/2011/12/01/this-is-the-electable-one/

Wow.  Mistermix over at Balloon Juice finds this attack ad on Romney.  Go watch it.  The punchline is at the end, when you see whose ad it is.

He compares Romney with Bachmann and finds Bachmann the much more polished campaigner, in the sense that Bachmann can easily repeat talking points no matter the context.

Romney has been hermetically sealed away from real people for so long, he doesn't know what to do when Fox News... FOX NEWS! asks him straightforward questions.  Imagine Bill Clinton or Barack Obama being asked questions about their biggest perceived weakness as a candidate.  Don't you think that they would have a ready, canned answer to that question?

Once Romney loses that aura of inevitability, what exactly does he have going for him?  His hair?  His jawline?  If that were enough, Perry would be in the lead.

That clearly must be the thinking behind the campaign that ran this ad.  Romney may LOOK inevitable, but he's simply not a very good candidate in a lot of ways.

Charlie Pierce returns from wherever he was hiding yesterday to give us this piece of brilliance.

Libertarians Are Ultimately Just Children

Let's start with the kids at the Von Mises Institute.

There is some merit to Austrian economics.  Not a ton, but there is some.  It tends to elevate the theoretical over the real world, but they make some good points from time to time.

But true Libertarians are just kind of nutty.  Ed at Gin and Tacos bring us this unbelievable - OK, actually not unbelievable per se, but gob smackingly awful - piece from the writers at the Von Mises Institute about trying to rehabilitate Scrooge.

Click thru and read the damned thing.

First, you have the mindless, reflexive obeisance to free market ideology.  "Bob Cratchett is being paid exactly what the market feels he should be worth."  Then, you have the heartless misanthropy.  "And Cratchett should not be rewarded for foolishly having all those kids."  And then the weird hero worship. "Scrooge is actually a very good and productive man."

This really struck me because I actually had the time and opportunity to read a New Yorker piece yesterday. Something I used to do quite often.  It is on David Thiel, the Silicon Valley investment guy who founded PayPal and funded the early days of Facebook.

In it, we learn of this very bright, precocious young man who went to Stanford and found it somewhat stultifying.  In his mind, education simply seeks to create conformists.  He - apparently by nature - is a contrarian.  And I think that's the first hallmark of a Libertarian.  That whatever is understood and received is probably wrong and should be opposed.

Obviously, this makes it the opposite of Burkean conservatism, which puts a premium on slow, evolutionary change that abides by traditions and standards.

At the end of the article, George Packer is at a dinner party with a bunch of these Silicon Valley Libertarian types.  They disparage college as being a waste of time, when people should be out following their entrepreneurial bliss.  When Packer mentions that maybe reading Great Books and arguing with people who don't come from your same background has value, the response was telling.

Around the table, the response was swift and negative.  (Artificial Intelligence researcher) Yudkowsky reported he was having a "visceral reaction" to what I'd said about great books.  (Biotech specialist) Nosek was visibly upset: in high school, in Illinois, he had failed an English class because his teacher said he couldn't write.

That last part is telling to me.  Libertarians tend not to handle failure well, and most tend not to have to face it. Nosek could not possibly be a bad writer.  School itself must have been the problem. Packer concludes:

The libertarian worship of individual freedom, and contempt for social convention, comes easiest to people who have never really had to grow up.  An appetite for disruption and risk - two of Thiel's favorite words - reflects, in part, a sense of immunity to the normal heartbreak and defeats that a deadening job, money trouble, and unhappy children deal out to the "unthinking herd."  Thiel and his circle in Silicon Valley may be able to imagine a future that would never occur to other people precisely because they've refused to leave that stage of youthful wonder which life forces most human beings to outgrow....Thiel is no different.  He wants to live forever, have the option to escape to outer space or an oceanic city-state, and play chess against a robot that can discuss Tolkien, because these were the fantasies that filled his childhood imagination.

That is probably as sympathetic and cutting a definition of the libertarian impulse as you're likely to read.

Oh, and the Tolkien reference? Yeah, that probably wasn't an accident.

There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Ringsand Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Potty Mouths, The Other Side Of The Story


So, I made my big speech yesterday.  I got a ton of very positive feedback from teachers and some positive feedback from students.  

Today, the issue of students using inappropriate language is in the news.  Emma Sullivan tweeted that she told Kansas governor Sam Brownback that he sucks.  

First, when I referred in my speech to the "S word", I was not referring to "suck".  I was also referring to the gratuitous use of profanity, rather than any absolute ban.  I remember my first year teaching.  The Korean students were plumping their "Korean Day" by doing a brief presentation of some dance and martial arts.  At which point, the "top boy" - a tall, lanky kid, very bright but spoke English poorly - put another kid on his shoulders.  That kid held a board out in front of him.  A third kid ran across the stage and kicked the board, snapping it right in front of the guy's face.  He walked over to the microphone and said in a low, heavily accented voice, "That scared shit out of me."

Everyone died laughing.  The Dean of Students turned red he was laughing so hard.  In that space, with that speaker, it was just hilarious.  It had a context that somehow made it acceptable.  That certainly doesn't mean that any and all contexts are open to profanity.

What Ms. Sullivan did was political speech.  She thinks her governor sucks.  I don't live in Kansas, but I think Sam Brownback sucks, too.

Anyways, Ruth Marcus wrote a scolding piece in the WaPo about how Emma Sullivan is some sort of Visigoth and her mom is awful and... well, this is exactly what I was saying was NOT the right tact to take with profanity.

For more on this issue, there is Charlie Pierce and Booman.  

The War On Christmas: Santa's Revenge


What the...  How... Who...

Screw that Peace on Earth crap, I guess.

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Iran Again


So, the Iranians have invaded the sovereign territory of a western power, in this case the British Embassy.

Immediately, older bloggers - like Charlie Pierce - felt like it was 1979 again and warned the neo-cons that this is proof of the shallow roots of the Green movement.  That the only thing Iranians hate more than their own government is foreign meddling.

I think that's only half true.  Certainly, Iranians are very nationalistic and very suspicious of foreign intervention.  This was true prior to '79 and it's only gotten "truer".

But today's actions were by a youth arm of the Basij - a sort of thuggish paramilitary group responsible for beating up the Green movement.  It's tough to know if the Basij answer to Ahmadinejad or Khamenei, but they don't speak for the mass of Iranians.  While the mass of Iranians may not love the British, they aren't interested in attacking their embassy.

Also, there are rumors that Khamenei is planning a constitutional change to a parliamentary system.  This would immediately undercut the institutional power of the presidency.  This may be because the next presidential election could become a powder keg.  Better to do away with it.  Much easier to gerrymander districts and over-represent various regime-friendly groups in the national assembly - the Majles - than transparently rig a national election.  It would also undermine Ahmadinejad's political standing, as he is posing a threat to Khamenei.

So the question is: Who sent these kids to the British embassy?  Was Khamenei trying to divert attention from his constitutional changes?  Was Ahmadinejad trying to force a crisis?  Or was this just the actions of a militant group of Basij against a country with a long history of being unpopular in Iran?

What's clear is that somehow, this will be a casus belli for the PNAC group and Obama will be at fault for not doing something that is objectively insane, like starting a land war in Asia.

In Which I Nearly Commit Career Suicide...

Well, I don't.

Today I did my annual address to the school.  I enjoy doing it, as a teacher.  Last year I talked about Katrina.

This year I talked about profanity, including racial slurs.  I used one.  I did not get fired.  I am relieved.

Here is the text:


Good morning.
First, let me apologize if this talk is a little rambling.  At Rev G’s request, I threw this jeremiad together over break between second helpings of turkey and separating two brawling boys.  I’m also going to take a huge risk later, and I’m really worried about it.  So we all have my discomfort to enjoy.

So as a sort of last minute talk, I’m just going to mull over an idea that keeps forcing itself into my thoughts.  It’s about the difference between public space and private space.

At first blush, this seems self-apparent.  The difference between your dorm room and your classroom seems pretty obvious.  You have some measure of privacy in your dorm room or your bedroom at home that obviously doesn’t exist, say, here in Bingham.  The school reinforces this idea by requiring dress codes and prohibiting cell phones in the halls, effectively saying that we expect different conduct in different spaces.

Yet, this is inherently a difficult idea for adolescents, I think.  It’s because you’re egocentric.  Don’t take that the wrong way.  You’re supposed to be egocentric.  It was probably just a few years ago that you realized that you are the star of your own movie.  You write the script, you perform, you weather the critics.  This is part of how you differentiate yourself from your childhood self – that part of you clinging to your mother’s warm, dry hand or hiding behind the mass of your father’s legs.  Your world revolves around you.  Even most altruism is simply someone playing the role of altruist at first.  Maybe it becomes that person’s true identity, maybe not.  But as you define yourselves as human beings, your focus is naturally on yourselves.

Which can sometimes blind you to the fact that you share the planet with other people.
The best example of this inability to recognize the difference between public and private space is profanity.  I don’t have a problem with profanity, per se.  I use it; I don’t blush when I hear it.  But – especially when I added two impressionable young children to my life – I had to come to the realization that my words – once they leave my mouth – belong to everyone who hears them.

Similarly, when you speak in class, for instance, your words belong to the class discussion.  The formulation of ideas that you put into words is now part of the shared experience of the class.  I think we understand that.  The idea of the commons.
But when you walk down the hall and drop an “F-bomb” and the top of your voice that’s also a public space.  Again, I’m not a squeamish prude, but I have come to realize that public spaces belong to all of us.  That includes the person who doesn’t want to hear your creative use of compound profanities.  This isn’t about political correctness – although I’ll touch on that in a minute – but rather about simply sharing the common space of our community with dignity and class. 

Some expletives are unplanned, like the inevitable stubbing of toes, the misplaced hammer blow, the sudden reception of shocking news.  But that’s not what one hears in the halls around here.  Instead, it’s just a reflexive use of profanity, because that’s what you hear and use in your private space and it bleeds over into the commons.

Take two examples of how pervasive profanity has become in the last 15 years or so.  George Carlin had a classic routine about the Seven Dirty Words You Can’t Say on television.  Now humor and profanity are both transgressive.  They get their kick from the fact you’re not supposed to say that or do that, and in saying a curse word or performing a practical joke, you violate some small rule and that’s what gives life its spice, its frisson.  But overuse that license and you destroy the tension that goes into using profanity or making risqué jokes. 

Three of Carlin’s seven worlds are ubiquitous on basic cable after 10pm every night of the week.  One, let’s call it the “S word” was the topic of a South Park episode a few years ago.  They even had a little counter at the bottom of the screen where every time Cartman said it, it rolled over to a new number.  I think they hit 200 in a 30 minute episode.  The South Park guys were making fun of our squeamishness over profanity, but they also demonstrated that once you overuse a word, it ceases to have any power, subversive or otherwise.  Put another way, what started out as subversive and creative became overkill and boring.

It’s not just out and out profanity either.  I’m going to go ahead and use these next two words as is, no euphemisms, and I apologize to any and all who take offense.  This is the part where I get very uncomfortable.  I want to talk about “bitch” and “nigger”.  There was a school of thought that blacks and women could use those words in such a way as to remove the sting from them.  It was a form of co-optation that allowed them to use a word that for centuries was a verbal form of oppression and abuse and strip it of its ability to gut punch someone. I remember living in LA in the early ‘90s and a friend walking me through an NWA song.  The use of both profanity and racist words had a point.  It was an expression of political rage.  It was searing. 

Later on, Meredith Brooks had a hit single called Bitch.  It is now almost impossible to find an entire rap album without someone using the N-word.  But I would argue that the theory of using a word to strip it of its power ultimately doesn’t work.  Instead, it has simply allowed license for people to use that word.  I know what NWA was trying to do, but 20 years later, I don’t think it has worked.  A lot of time and energy went into making “N-word” the “N-word”, into making it something that was simply not OK to use under any circumstances. 

Hopefully, a middle aged white guy saying it makes you uncomfortable, but when I am in the weight room and the music constantly drops the N word and the F word, that’s a violation of public space.  As a history teacher, I don’t want my country to be a country where it’s OK to call someone that word.  Too much blood was spilled in order to end the idea that some people can label other people.  And if I hear it, I will turn it off.  Because it’s not just a word, it’s a word that was used for centuries to say that some people were better than others.  And this obviously goes for any other slur.  To be clear, as far as I know, Taft students don’t go around calling each other the N-word.  But I’ve heard you call each other “gay”.  It’s the same thing.  But even if we don’t use the words ourselves, if we blast music – out of our dorm window or during warm-ups before practice – that uses slurs – whether sexist, racist or what have you – we are tacitly endorsing their use.

I know that you’re the star of your own movie, but your movie overlaps with everyone else’s movie, too, and there needs to be some basic level of agreement on what theaters show PG and what theaters show R rated movies.  To use another metaphor, if we see someone throwing their garbage out the car window, we understand that they have polluted the common space we all live in.  And while the occasional candy wrapper or stray receipt may fall out of your pocket, don’t make a habit of throwing your entire happy meal on the sidewalk.

This isn’t about thought police, it’s about courtesy.  We live cheek by jowl here at Taft.  Most of you will decide to share your life with someone else, share a home with a family.  Get used to the idea that being part of a community means putting just enough filter on your words so that you don’t make others uncomfortable, and that includes nattering old farts like me, apparently.

Finally, there is another area where the interplay between public and private is very tricky.  And that’s the virtual world.  So much of our life happens on line, and we haven’t yet come up with etiquette for that world.

Some of you know I have a blog.  The only people who read it regularly are my mom and a few of her friends.  Sometimes, I am moved to use profanity, because sometimes profanity is called for.  It’s my blog, after all, and if I want to curse, I can.  Except, my audience apparently consists of not a few 70 year old matrons in the greater Atlanta area, Deirdre Shea and Angel Pan, so I have to tone it down just a bit.  In the end, I have to write as though I was sitting in front of my mom, which means when the s hits the fan it does not do so gratuitously.  And maybe gratuitously is the important filter and finding out what that filter is, well, that’s worth consciously thinking about.

Similarly, social media puts you guys in almost constant contact with each other.  But think about the physical dynamic of being on line.  You are usually isolated somehow.  You are interacting with a screen, not another person.  You lose that filter that naturally occurs when you are next to someone.  I’ve been part of an internet chat group for over 12 years.  It’s a group of people who started out talking about Braves baseball in an ESPN chat room in the early days of the internet, back in the dial-up era.  Now we have our own website and some of us post daily.  I know a little bit about most of them, some of them have met up at games and met as real people.  We have running inside jokes that stretch back almost a decade.

It’s nice.

This summer, we let a whole bunch of new people into the site.  Many of them your age, refugees from some new rules at ESPN’s chat board.  Immediately, flame wars and personal invective started flying.  The rules and norms that the old timers (and the old timers are not all that old, many are in their 20s) had put into place were overwhelmed by the internet culture of casual cruelty.  It took a month before we had straightened out, and we straightened it out, because we all wanted to continue talking about baseball, not calling each other names.

But for most of the internet, there is no referee.  And without the buffer of looking another human being in the eye when you insult them, much of the internet can be caustic and unpleasant.  Not because everyone there is caustic and unpleasant, but because there are usually a few people who would take the commons of the internet and turn it into a swamp.  Rather than share a public space with everyone, they insist on colonizing it into their own personal space and filling it with their own unpleasant baggage.

But remember this, too, the internet never forgets.  If you think you can infect some public corner of the internet with your private bilge, remember that it’s always out there.  Increasingly, companies are checking people’s online personae as part of their hiring process.  Emails are not as private as you think.  The promise of the internet is that it is a commons, a public space, for a new century.  The peril is that before it can become the commons, it will sink to the lowest common denominator.  It will be about insult and profanity and not respecting the common rights of all to use it.

There are endless examples of this inability to differentiate between public and private spaces.  People on their cellphones loudly talking about their colonoscopies.  Dude, I do not need to hear that.  I’m glad the polyp was benign, but c’mon! 

The point is not to censor everything you say or think.  Political correctness simply for the sake of political correctness is both censorship and a power play.

I would just challenge you to recognize that your life plays out in public.  Not all of it, thankfully, but a lot of your life is there for the world to see, whether it is what comes out of your mouth or your stereo speakers or by the deeds you do.  And in seeing you, the world will judge you.  Not because you make Miss Manner’s retreat to her fainting couch, but because ultimately you will be judged by the consideration you show others.  

Are We At Some Sort Of Tipping Point?

Herman Cain's third grade homework.

Three things happened that bode poorly for Willard Romney.

First, the DNC launched an attack on Romney for his constantly shifting positions on the issues.  This is important because except for some fumbling stabs at this by Perry and Pawlenty, GOP candidates have not really gone after Romney for being "Multiple Choice Mitt".  Part of this is an effort by the DNC to prepare the ground for a run against Mitt, but it's also a way of getting the opponent they prefer.

Second, Herman Cain?  Can you please return your campaign to the help desk?  Your hard drive is apparently corrupted.  Any collapse in Cain support should accrue to Newt's advantage.

Third, Gingrich seems to finally get that he has a chance at this thing.  Rather than just doing book signings, he's actually opening campaign offices and getting a ground game going.  Given how much the Tea Party types have stood on the sidelines, he may be able to overcome his late start if they rally behind him.

Right now, I have the odds at nomination of Romney 50%, Gingrich 45%, the field 5%.

The more Romney no longer looks inevitable, the faster he could sink.

Monday, November 28, 2011

We Will Miss You, Barney

Enjoy your milk, Barney.

Barney Frank is retiring.  Why do we love Barney?  Because of things like this.

Frank could be as funny and caustic as a politician was allowed to be.  He is blindingly smart and lightning quick.  I know he said he wants to write, but he has a mind made for television for the quick give and take.

He and Rachel Maddow would be the perfect GLAAD tag team for MSNBC.

Today In Newt Gingrichland


So, Leroy went out and got himself an endorsement.  Normally, newspaper endorsements are about as valuable as Joe the Plumber's, but there is a general feeling this might be more.  Everyone is no doubt watching to see if Leroy eventually becomes the Final, Preferred, Approved NotRomney.

There are rumors of social conservatives in Iowa trying to rally behind a single NotRomney and now we have this.  With the Flavor of the Month Crowd (Bachmann, Perry, Cain) you had a lot of "dating" going on.  They got some small online donors.  Perry brought his Texas moneymen with him.  But the big institutional GOP machinery has remained largely aloof from all this.  It's unusual.  I know Rove is moving behind the scenes to shore up Romney, but the rest of them have largely stayed hidden from the limelight.

The holidays are upon us.  People are not paying much attention to politics.  The usual ebb and flow (at least in this electoral cycle) might not hold after, say, the 20th.  If Newt is still viable by then, I think he stands a decent chance of winning Iowa.  Win Iowa, take second in New Hampshire and he can hope South Carolina and Florida will give him the needed momentum to sweep up all the NonRomney votes.

It's plausible.  Believe it or not, it's plausible.

Sunday, November 27, 2011

Walking Dead Liveblog


So, made it home just in time.  Let's see what the "midseason finale" is all about.

Well, we've got all sorts of tension in the opening few seconds.  And Glenn goes and drops a nice big one on the group. And then we get a Gollum eye for good effect.

Shane is near the breaking point.  He's gone full metal gonzo.  That's certainly interesting.

***

Glenn cost himself his nice hottie girlfriend.

Carl is turning into a pint sized man.

Is this sexual tension between Carol and Daryl or something different?  If so... Odd.

Great scene between Dale and Andrea.  All of their scenes are good.  Complex, subtle.  I worry that Dale's good impulses are going to get him in a boatload of trouble.

"It changes you.  Either into one of Them or into something less than you once were."  That's pretty much this season in a nutshell.

Ah, what will this little nugget of info do to Shane?  Will being a secret papa change the way he looks at things?

***

Herschel is going to come face to face with an angry daughter.  And a smart one.

"Rick ain't built for this world."  I guess that's the big question.  Is he or isn't he?

Careful Lori.  Shane's crazy.

Carl's awesome.  But what has Shane in mind for him?  Seriously, Shane is starting to get creepy.  Not sure that's the best way to go, unless we're going to get some resolution soon.

So, Herschel's decision to not off the Walkers is "about him" not about them.

***

Hey, Herschel?  Just because a Walker follows you home doesn't mean you can keep him.

Yay, Glenn.  You win.

They keep reinforcing the idea that the Walkers reveal who you are.

***

Crap.  The series resumes in February.  Same as Justified.  Better get my work done in January.

Wow, they went full Peckinpah there at the end.  I guess that solves the problem of the barn.

Oh.  Damn.  Oh.  Damn.

That's chilling.

And of course, it's up to Rick to end it.

Wow.  Just wow.  What an ending.  Not a cliff hanger but a sad, mournful moment that brings the whole season to a close.  Of course, the question is still open.  What sort of man will you be when the world goes to hell?  Herschel?  Rick?  Shane?  Dale?  Glenn?

And we have to wait until February?  Damnit!

About To Brave The Commute Home

Pray for me and my family in the hour of our need.  Maybe one of the prayers you were going to lob at Tebow?