Blog Credo

The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.

H.L. Mencken

Sunday, September 2, 2012

Eastwood, The Coda

Laurence Lewis at Daily Kos:

The saddest thing about Clint Eastwood's embarrassing performance at the Republican National Convention is that it seemed so out of character for a man who always has been more nuanced and complicated than his macho film persona would suggest. In fact, many of his films have been more nuanced and complicated than many realize, often demonstrating a sensitivity to cultural diversity that is anathema to most Republicans, once making the case for end of life choice, and once even revealing the pettiness and empty false mythology behind the violent Westerns that first made him famous.
Eastwood has come out in favor of gay marriage, but he supports a presidential candidate who would ban it, and spoke to the convention of a party that is openly bigoted against the LGBT community. Eastwood last winter cut an ad that expressed appreciation for the auto bailout that Mitt Romney opposed and President Obama created. Eastwood is an environmentalist in a party that sees nature as nothing but a commodity to be exploited and exhausted. Eastwood in his speech decried the ongoing war in Afghanistan, seemingly oblivious to the fact that the Republicans oppose even the limited withdrawal President Obama signed. Eastwood mocked liberal Hollywood, but has a history of working well with noted liberal activists such as Morgan Freeman, Ed Harris, Sean Penn, Tim Robbins and Hillary Swank. He has been known as a man of dignity, unpretentious, widely respected, well-liked.
Clint Eastwood is 82 years old, but there is no evidence that his mental faculties have been suffering. He still directs substantial films, and he still demonstrates wisdom in his choices of films to direct. If there is any lesson to be drawn from his public self-immolation it is that even a nuanced and complicated and normally respectable man cannot stand in the GOP spotlight without being soiled by it. This was a self-inflicted disaster, and Eastwood has no one to blame but himself. It was, nevertheless, sad.

Happy Labor Day


What's Axelrod Up To?

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/axelrod-gop-convention-terrible-failure

Obama campaign guru claims that the GOP convention was a "terrible failure".  While I recognize that spin and bold claims are a staple of campaign flack discourse, why make that statement now?  Do they have poll numbers?  Nate Silver suggests that a typical convention bounce is 5-6 polling points.  For a variety of reasons, we have fewer undecided morons voters this year.  So the bounce is going to be smaller anyway.  He predicts 2-3 points for each candidate.  Romney needed more than that.

Let's see if Obama is winning on Monday or Tuesday.  If so, then Axelrod is probably right.

He's not as smart as a chair, but he's pretty clever.

Saturday, September 1, 2012

Mitt Romney Is A Dick, v.287265

And he's incompetent, too.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/scocca/2012/08/clint_eastwood_gop_convention_the_romney_campaign_sells_out_its_surprise_speaker_.single.html

The Eastwood thing alternates between funny and sad, of course.  Mostly funny.  Eastwood's a legend, his films will live on and in a few years the epic weirdness of Thursday night will be but a tickle in the back of the collective memory.

But for a candidate running on his competency as a business man, the Romney campaign has been pretty damned incompetent.  And I'm not just talking about Romney's personal shortcomings as a politician.

There is this:

There is this:


There is your keynote speaking for an hour about how awesome HE is:


And despite 8% unemployment, they couldn't find a LEGITIMATE angle of attack, so the well delivered battle cry from their VEEP becomes obscured by this:


And then there is this...

But what's interesting about this, is that Mitt Romney is not exactly Harry Truman.  The buck doesn't stop with him.  Read the Slate piece above.  "Eastwood's not OUR fault!  Neither was Christie's Ode To Myself. Not me!  I didn't do that!" I guess when it comes to their own convention, "They didn't build that."

Yeah, he's no Harry Truman, but he might be Thomas Dewey...

UPDATE: Don't believe me:
That's the Intrade market for Obama's re-election.

Here's Romney's

Who's got the bounce now?

Friday, August 31, 2012

Colbert

If there is something funnier than Stephen Colbert interviewing Eastwood's Chair, I don't think I could stand it.

Paul Ryan Might Be A Sociopath


Paul Ryan gave an interview where he boasted of his running a sub 3 hour marathon.  Which is a legit big deal.  For runners.

Well, guess what...He's lying about that, too.

Let's just take a moment to think about that.  Talking about whether you ran a decent marathon time is probably a moment prone to bullshit.  However, he's a politician who probably gave Al Gore grief for "inventing the Internet".  So, Al Gore never claimed to invent the Internet, that was entirely made up.  But Paul Ryan is on the record lying about his marathon time.

That's kind of pathological.

Because you can't - I mean you absolutely can't - expect that in this day and age you can make a statement and not get checked on it.  That was true in Al Gore's day, it was true in George "Macaca" Allen's day and it's true now.

So basically, Paul Ryan is a reflexive liar.  And I mean that in the sense that he really just goes along and... BAM... there goes a lie.  It's not something he consciously thinks about - the way I imagine Mitt Romney lies - but rather a complete reflex.

Of course, there is an alternate explanation.  Paul is so demonstrably awful at math, that he really thought he ran a sub 3 hour marathon, because 3... 4... what's really the difference when you're talking hours... or trillions of dollars.

UPDATE: Fallows does a good job:
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/09/the-real-mystery-of-paul-ryans-marathon-time/261866/

FTW

Jon Stewart wins the competition of geriatric actors:

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/jon-stewart-offers-up-hilarious-parody-version-of-romneys-biographical-film/

UPDATE: Eastwooding.

My favorite tweet of my own: GOP can't decide if he's an Ottoman or a LaZBoy

UPDATE 2: The hits keep coming:
Watching Ann Romney during the Eastwood address, according to NPR political correspondent Mara Liasson, was like watching “the mother of the bride listening to a drunken wedding toast.”

Department of Unintentional Humor Department


Reading Romney's Speech

Wee gymnast is unimpressed.

OK, I wasn't going to watch it, because Mitt gives me the creeps.

But I'm going to read it.

The first bit is just awful.  That "better future stuff"?  Poorly written, like a hack screenwriter writing a generic speech for a generic candidate in a movie that has nothing to do with politics.

I think this sums it up:

The second part about the problems of the last four years was better.  I don't know how it sounded (thank God) but it reads well.  This was the campaign message Romney had been working on since winter.  Obama was a nice guy over his head.  Not surprising that this was strong.

I get the paean to Neil Armstrong, but after a convention dedicated to chanting, "You didn't build that" the best example Mitt could come up with was a massively expensive government program.

The tribute to his parents was nice, but I couldn't help thinking what a fine candidate George Romney would have been.  As opposed to, say, his son.  The pander about Mexico was just one of a great many panders to women and dusky hued Latinos.  I can't imagine them working.

He did a good job talking about his Mormon faith without talking about his Mormon faith.  That was always going to be a tricky act, and I think he pulled that off well.

I thought his stuff about Bain was borderline lies.  A plucky small business?  Please.

When it got into policy specifics, well, that's when the lies started.  "War on coal and gas" - lie, America's producing more gas than ever before, which is depressing coal prices.  "His" cuts to the military - lie, that was part of the deal Paul Ryan voted for.  Medicare cuts - lies.

I guess we can praise him for not bring up the welfare stuff.

His Five Point Plan is a joke.  There's not one specific in it.  It's a series of aspirations without any roadmap how to get there.

Then he goes back to the apology lie, before picking fights with Russia and China.  That will work...

And then he ends with a nice, uplifting vision of America.  But again, generic.

We stopped inviting politicians to speak at our graduation ceremonies, because they usually just give a stock speech.  It's not necessarily a bad speech, but there is nothing resonant about it.

Romney gave a speech that had a good, pointed criticism of the Obama years, but was otherwise generic and bland with no specifics.

He needed to offer America a shot of whiskey and he gave them an O'Douls instead.

Thursday, August 30, 2012

Read The Future Today

Remember a few days ago, how I said that the GOP was running the first Dadaist campaign?

I had no idea how right I was until Clint Eastwood took the stage.

UPDATE: There are some awesome tweets out there, but I loved this one:

This is a perfect representation of the campaign: an old white man arguing with an imaginary Barack Obama.

Clint Eastwood Continues To Cut Obama Commercials

Apparently he did one at the RNC....

UPDATE:  Well, that didn't take long:
https://twitter.com/InvisibleObama

BTW, Twitter is a great alternative to actually watching the debate.

They Know They're Losing

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/kit-bond-obama-will-stop-at-nothing-to

When they start yammering about ACORN and the New Black Panther party stealing elections... That's when you know they've seen the writing on the wall.

The Big Question

Will Mitt double down on the lies?

It Pains Ezra Klein To Say It, But...


http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/08/30/a-not-very-truthful-speech-in-a-not-very-truthful-campaign/

Yeah, Paul Ryan and Mitt Romney are dreadful liars.

I don't know if this is an example of pained centrism dying beneath the lies or "I have come to bury Caesar, not to praise him", but it's an interesting tone.

Klein is pointing out that Ryan's speech was essentially fabricated from lies, hypocrisies and willful misconstruing of the facts.  But it's apparently very painful for him to admit that.

Anyway, he actually levels some pretty good attacks on Obama, which you can argue are plausible.  Ryan didn't use them.  Then - mother of Zeus - he actually compares Ryan's speech to Sarah Palin's.  And Palin comes off as Diogenes compared to the zombie eyed granny starver.

Ryan is a very gifted politician.  He is also a compelling liar.

But I repeat myself.

UPDATE: Chait shows how it's done:

The political blogosphere has taken apart Ryan’s brazen dishonesty brick by brick so that barely anything remains. I have been writing about his dishonesty for three years. I have the equivalent of a master’s degree in Ryan lie-ology. I’ve heard many of his lurid fantasies innumerable times and I haven’t got it in me to go through it all again — his deep dishonesty largely reflects the fundamental gap between the radicalism of his agenda and his need for public acceptance. I’ll merely point out that, even if all the smaller component dishonesties of Ryan’s speech were true, the larger points they undergirded were false as well.

It's A Start...

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/08/paul-ryan-convention-speech-media-backlash.php